FBI blitz at Trumps house tycoon They didnt want witnesses

FBI blitz at Trump’s house, tycoon: “They didn’t want witnesses, we hope they don’t place evidence”

donald trump did not answer questions from the New York Attorney General Letizia James as part of the investigation into the tax returns of the Trump organization. “I’m going to see the Attorney General tomorrow racist of New York for continuing the greatest witch hunt in the history of Use‘ the former president commented on his Truth Social last night. “My great company and myself are being attacked from all sides. Banana Republic! “. We must therefore await a turning point in the judicial events that will affect Trump, while the former President faces the consequences of the FBI’s search of his residence Mar-a-Lago Looking for papers that Trump may have brought with him after his departure White House. And it was precisely on the federal operation that the former president wanted to say that given the ban on his associates and lawyers from approaching and witnessing the “Mar-Lago raid,” the agents “wanted to be alone, with no witnesses who saw what.” they saw did, took or hopefully didn’t present evidence. Why did they insist on having nobody? Despite the major disputes they’ve had, there has never been a crackdown on Obama or Clinton.”

That conspiracy theories are already circulating, especially among supporters of the former president. Among them is also the one for which the search would be the result of Tip of a spy present at Mar-a-Lago, one “Treacherous Mole” who would report information to the FBI. They argue that the mole leaked information and evidence to the FBI about what was really at Mar-a-Lago. This would have led to the 9 hour search and the collection of ten material boxes. The FBI Blitz at the Trump house, according to The Wall Street Journal, it is not part of the State Department’s Jan. 6 investigation. The 30 federal agents searched Mar-a-Lago’s private property, also searched former first lady Melania’s closet and spent hours in Trump’s confidential office, the New York Post reports, citing some sources. According to the Washington Post, the FBI’s raid was aimed at determining whether the former president or his allies had surrendered or minus the documents and other materials belonging to the government. Authorities have begun to doubt Trump’s returned documents in recent months, as they suspect some were withheld by the former president. The American Attorney General Merrick garland As a result, he was caught in the crosshairs of the Republican Party. Not even the director of the FBI escapes the attacks, Christopher Wray, appointed by the former President. Compact Republicans are asking her for an explanation of unprecedented action. “It needs to be explained what led to the search,” said the Senate Republican leader. Mitch McConnellexpressing his party’s dissatisfaction there. The Justice Department does not comment. Mouths also sewn to the FBI.

Agents confiscated the Republican congressman’s cell phone Scott Perry, an ally of Donald Trump, as Perry said on Fox, pointing out that he was approached by three agents in the past few hours who issued him with a warrant and confiscated his phone. “You made no attempt to contact my attorney – noted Perry again – I’m outraged but not surprised, for the fact that the FBI, under the direction of Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice, seized a sitting Congressman’s cell phone. And he added: “My phone contains information about my legislative and political activities, private conversations with my wife, family, constituents and friends. None of this is government business.” He then pressed: “As with President Trump, the Justice Department chose this excessive and aggressive approach rather than simply contacting my attorneys.”

Ukraine, Biden signs the treaty of Sweden and Finland joining NATO

also read

Ukraine, Biden signs the treaty of Sweden and Finland joining NATO

The Federal Office’s action has even sparked controversy among voters: “It’s was,” conservative commentator Steven Crowder wrote on Twitter to his 1.9 million followers. A rage shared by many of the former president’s supporters online. “This means war,” wrote The Gateway Pandit, a pro-Trump publication. Thanks to a linked account, a post on Telegram also dropped Stephen Bannon. The flash “shows what many of us have been saying for a while. We’re at war,” said Joe Kent, a Trump-backed House candidate, on the Bannon’s War Room podcast. Harsh and violent language worries political pundits. Even if this does not translate directly into physical violence, it creates an atmosphere of violence that is slowly becoming more and more accepted.

Meanwhile, the former White House tenant – who has not denied the hypothesis of a re-run in the 2024 election – is being questioned under oath about his in the civil investigation of New York Attorney General Letitia James Business practices as a real estate magnate. “Tonight in New York City. Attorney General tomorrow for a continuation of the greatest witch hunt in US history! – wrote Trump via the social network Truth- I and my big company are under attack from all sides. Banana Republic!”. Trump is also grappling with unresolved tax issues. A federal appeals court upheld the lower court’s ruling allowing the House of Representatives to gain access to its tax returns despite his status as a former president. The litigation isn’t over, however, as Trump’s attorneys are sure to appeal to the Supreme Court, the final appellate court in the affair’s trial. If at least four (out of nine) judges vote to review the appeal, it could delay the final decision until next year. Meanwhile, Republicans may have regained a majority in the House of Representatives in November’s midterm elections and may decide to withdraw a request to review the former president’s tax documents. By refusing to show their tax returns to the public, Trump broke with the established tradition followed by his predecessors in modern times.