"Charles and Camilla will not govern": the shocking prophecy of the astrologer

"Charles and Camilla will not govern": the shocking prophecy of the astrologer

All the worries of the royal family were not enough after the release of Harry’s book “Spare”, which, among other things, attacks his brother William and the not exactly idyllic relationship between the father King Charles III: Now a famous woman has intervened astrologer Englishman who predicted the impossibility of governing for the heir of Queen Elizabeth II, who died on September 8th.

“The worst crisis in 248 years”

In the case of Charles and his wife Camilla, the negative impact mercury it could even prevent the king from governing: he told the British newspaper Express.Co Jessica Adamsalready author of numerous books. “Charles and Camilla will not govern,” he said, stressing that it could be the biggest “boost for the monarchy in 248 years”.

What happens on May 6th

Unbelieving Brits and enthusiasts will wonder why this chaos is predicted by the astrologer who told the British newspaper that the “blame” is on the planet: The date for King Charles III’s coronation. however is scheduled for May 6, 2023 Plans could go bad, very bad. The hope is that there could be “a date postponement or a cancellation”. But then what is the reason? It is Mercury that will trade retrograde these days, bringing “complications in communication and travel, a time for thought rather than action.”

Therefore, according to the expert, the best time would be during the full moon what is cheap. We don’t know if it’s a negative or positive factor, but the astrologer told the English newspaper the proposed date also falls on the fourth birthday of Harry and Meghan’s son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. “He chose one of the most unfavorable horoscope dates of 2023 for his investiture proposal,” Adams added, concluding that the Church of England must prepare even for the impossibility of Charles and Camilla ruling.

The problem of adultery

But Mercury isn’t over yet: the astrologer, in a letter to The Guardian, upped the ante by writing that the Church of England “has never crowned a divorced man king, and thereby its supreme governor, let alone one who has publicly confessed to adultery – with the woman in question, also divorced, sitting next to him awaiting to be crowned Queen Consort”. A catastrophe of biblical proportions, one might think: Adams explained that a late Archbishop of Canterbury, Robert Runcie, had confided in her that he wanted one oath verification the coronation, which in turn would have required a new Statute of Parliament. In short, alongside the planet there is also adultery: who knows how it has taken the royal family, who, with all due respect to Mercury, are facing current problems far more serious and delicate than the symbolic date of Charles’s coronation.